Cyberpunk 2077 doesnt look weird enough to be edgy  06/14/2019 14:54:12   Adi Robertson
CD Projekt Red

At E3 2019, there are two versions of Cyberpunk 2077. First, theres the version that developer CD Projekt Red  best known for the Witcher series  is teasing in interviews, presentations, swag, and posters lining the walls of its promotional booth. Its a narratively deep role-playing game set in a cutthroat world where people change their bodies radically according to the whims of employers and cultural fads, trying to survive in an economic system that objectifies and exploits them in surreal ways.

Then, theres the thing that CD Projekt Red is showing behind closed doors: a good-looking but generic shooter-RPG hybrid with an 80s retro-futuristic sensibility and a grab bag of William Gibson references. The closer Cyberpunk gets to its release date next April, the more likely it seems that this will be the games final form. It also seems increasingly less likely to earn the moments that critics at E3 have called racist or transphobic  but that the developers say are just depicting a gritty future.

Cyberpunks latest demo has attracted controversy for a couple of reasons. Rock Paper Shotgun pointed out troubling racial undertones with the demo mission, where players infiltrate an abandoned mall to fight a gang dubbed the Animals that appears primarily composed of people of color. (CD Projekt Red later said this wouldnt be true in the final game.) And a commentator on Twitter noted an in-game ad that seems to creepily fetishize trans women.

The Cyberpunk team says things are more complex than that. We consider the city itself, Night City, almost the main antagonist of the game, says CD Projekt Red senior level designer Miles Tost. Its not a nice place to be. It shouldnt be a place where people go, at the end of our game, I would like to live here.

The advertisements artist, for example, has told Polygon that she was trying to show corporations exploiting peoples sexuality. People in the ads of Cyberpunk 2077 are horribly objectified, but thats very much intentionally so, says Tost. Since this is a dystopian exaggeration of how things will develop, so [are] our ads  we have some really terrible ads that you look at in the game and go Ah, this place is pretty fucked. Its supposed to really get this reaction out of you.

Its possible to imagine a game that justifies this. Cyberpunk 2077 could contrast these ads with the real experience of trans and gender-nonconforming people in this future, for instance, or create a world where sexual expression is so genuinely weird that our current identity labels no longer apply. After all, this is supposed to be a place where people can change body parts constantly  to the point where (as shown in posters and trailers) some people have three mouths and others have none.

In the actual Cyberpunk demo, though, CD Projekt Red seems to downplay weirdness at every turn. Body modification is a big part of the game, and were supposed to have extensive character customization options for our protagonist V. Theres a really high degree of options for players to really build a character that they want to play, says Tost.

The demo, however, showed us two versions of V (one male, one female) who both seemed like generic, trim-bodied video game characters with some circuitry lines around their faces; one had nondescript mechanical arms. The major non-player characters were relatively average-looking humans, too, with the exception of one roided-out Animals boss. Thats a perfectly valid design approach, but it doesnt really sell the idea that were in a radically different future.

The demo was simply bland in general. As previously mentioned, V has to infiltrate the base of a gang called the Animals, who are guarding a surveillance van that could spell trouble for Night Citys underworld. V is trying to ingratiate him- or herself with a different gang called the Voodoo Boys, since their leader could help V learn more about a mysterious brain chip that apparently holds the secret to immortality. That chip also contains the digital ghost of a helpful character named Johnny Silverhand  who is essentially a clone of Keanu Reeves in mirrored shades and leather pants.

These are all fun ideas, but the main missions gameplay was largely a reskinning, albeit an unusually gruesome one, on average immersive sim-influenced gameplay. The female strong solo V could pull open doors with her arms. The male netrunner could hack cameras to turn them off, hack robot boxers to attack their partners, or hack peoples mechanical limbs to make them kill themselves. But it felt more like a series of scripted events than an organic system that you could learn and exploit. I didnt see the kind of complex level design that games like Deus Ex or Hitman have excelled at, and despite their very different powers, the gameplay vibe for both Vs felt similar. Theyd generally walk around a series of large spaces shooting and strangling people either loudly or quietly, sometimes opening a door or hacking an item in a unique way.

The full game might feel better fleshed out. Were doing everything we can to make sure that the variety here is as high as possible, says Tost. That includes adding dialogue role-playing options; players can select a background like street kid or corporate defector and gain access to special conversation trees. Again, though, the demo didnt really show us how rich those are  the options there seemed limited to asides that might give you a little bit of extra information, not the kind of full-fledged unlockable paths that games like Harebrained Schemes Shadowrun series offer.

Dont get me wrong, I love the idea of sneaking around abandoned malls and hanging out with the leather-clad ghost of Keanu Reeves. And I love some of the games ideas, like characters you cant talk to until youve gotten the correct translation software. But so far, everything points to Cyberpunk 2077 being a by-the-numbers open-world role-playing game with some unusually cool, but disappointingly underexplored lore and aesthetic motifs. And if thats true, then its hard to imagine the game really earning its moments of edginess.

Tost says the game is broadly trying to be inclusive and not make players feel unwelcome. The idea of being gay or straight in the world of Cyberpunk 2077 is basically is a non-issue, for example  now that I think about it, maybe thats actually one of the aspects of life that might have been better than here [in the present].

He acknowledges, however, that it can be tricky to depict bigotry or oppression as part of a fully realized world, rather than just seeming to throw it in players faces. We cant allow for ourselves to make things look like an accident, he says. If you show that the choices are being made deliberately to bring context to the world and explain a certain situation or circumstance in the society and the world as a whole, I think thats something that players can pick up on and understand.

Id love to see CD Projekt Red actually pull that off. I just personally havent seen that larger dystopian world established beyond (sometimes literal) window dressing. This isnt a problem unique to Cyberpunk 2077; its something that a lot of big-budget games struggle with. The Deus Ex series, which is set in a similar cyberpunk world, tried to explore oppression with an ill-advised mechanical apartheid storyline. But the theme was a terrible fit for a cyborg power fantasy. Cyberpunk 2077s dystopia doesnt seem quite so on-the-nose, but it also seems to be playing with heavy themes without truly delving into them.

The more directly a game (or movie, or book) evokes real, ugly social problems, the more carefully it needs to approach them. Thats the difference between exploitation and commentary  and Cyberpunk 2077 hasnt shown that its deep enough for the latter.

« Go back